Mapping the next energy budget
Officials are turning energy security promises into spreadsheets, deadlines, and someone to blame.

The modelling room: every promise becomes a row, every row gets an owner.
Energy security used to be a speech. This year it became a spreadsheet with 4,000 rows, each one a promise with a deadline and — the column everyone fought over — a named owner.
The budget maps a decade: which plants close, which cables land, which neighbourhoods get storage first. The politics is in the sequencing, because everything popular happens early and everything difficult happens to someone else's constituency.
Promises, row by row
The method is disarmingly simple. Every pledge from the last three summits was entered, costed, and scheduled; the gaps were published rather than hidden. The resulting shortfall — bigger than admitted, smaller than feared — now has a work plan instead of a slogan.
The blame column
Officials joke nervously about the owner column, because it works. Named responsibility has already unblocked two stalled interconnectors and one very stuck planning inquiry. “Nobody wants to be the row that stays red,” one director said. The dashboard updates monthly, in public.
Key points
- 4,000-row public map of pledges, costs and deadlines
- Every row carries a named owner and a monthly status
- Two interconnectors unblocked since publication
The next update lands in autumn, when the red rows will have to explain themselves. Energy security, it turns out, was never a speech. It was always a spreadsheet — it just took a decade to admit it.
Follow the money, every morning.
Energy, budgets and the negotiations behind them, in one weekday email.


